Skip to content

The Progressive Case Against Voting for Obama

The Progressive Case Against Voting for Obama

October 28, 2012 SVadmin Comments 5 comments

An essay by Matt Stoller (“The progressive case against Obama”), published yesterday in Salon, is the most extraordinary piece of analysis I’ve read in this political season, or in any other. And, as a progressive (and possibly as an erstwhile Obama supporter), I have to say it rocked my world (and I’ve never said that before).

Stoller, a longtime Democratic activist and major fundraiser, makes the progressive case against voting for Obama. For me, this was painful reading: Even though I’ve been aware of many of Obama’s shortcomings, Stoller made me aware of some very serious others.

If nothing else, all liberals and progressives should read this essay so at least we can say that we voted with our eyes wide open.

And if you are inclined to say, “Yeah, but what about women’s rights? At least the choice is clearly in favor of Obama on that issue” Or, “What about the Supreme Court?” … STILL you should read Stoller’s essay.

Excerpts:

“Under Bush, economic inequality was bad, as 65 cents of every dollar of income growth went to the top 1 percent. Under Obama, however, that number is 93 cents out of every dollar. That’s right, under Barack Obama there is more economic inequality than under George W. Bush. And if you look at the chart above, most of this shift happened in 2009-2010, when Democrats controlled Congress. This was not, in other words, the doing of the mean Republican Congress. And it’s not strictly a result of the financial crisis; after all, corporate profits did crash, like housing values did, but they also recovered, while housing values have not.”

” … during the transition itself, Bush’s Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson offered a deal to Barney Frank, to force banks to write down mortgages and stem foreclosures if Barney would speed up the release of TARP money. Paulson demanded, as a condition of the deal, that Obama sign off on it. Barney said fine, but to his surprise, the incoming president vetoed the deal. Yup, you heard that right — the Bush administration was willing to write down mortgages in response to Democratic pressure, but it was Obama who said no, we want a foreclosure crisis. And with Neil Barofsky’s book ”Bailout,” we see why. Tim Geithner said, in private meetings, that the foreclosure mitigation programs were not meant to mitigate foreclosures, but to spread out pain for the banks, the famous “foam the runway” comment. This central lie is key to the entire Obama economic strategy. It is not that Obama was stymied by Congress, or was up against a system, or faced a massive crisis, which led to the shape of the economy we see today. Rather, Obama had a handshake deal to help the middle class offered to him by Paulson, and Obama said no. He was not constrained by anything but his own policy instincts. And the reflation of corporate profits and financial assets and death of the middle class were the predictable results.”

I’m not sure how I’m going to vote this time. (UPDATE: It didn’t take much thought to figure this out. See my comment below).

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Blog, Economics, Environment, Politics

Post navigation

PREVIOUS
Julia Morgan’s Berkeley City Club
NEXT
Palast on Kochs Pilfering from Indians, Bill Clinton’s Real Impeachable Crime?

Join Our Mailing List

5 thoughts on “The Progressive Case Against Voting for Obama”

  1. Jeff Pelline says:
    October 28, 2012 at 9:23 am

    If not Obama, then who?

  2. Don Pelton says:
    October 28, 2012 at 12:24 pm

    The trouble with Stoller’s critique as I see it is that he makes the perverse implication that because progressives have an inclination to assume that Obama is a progressive and consequently feel that it is enough to merely vote for him, it would be better to have in office someone we trust less and we would therefore pressure by means of activist movement politics.

    Better would be to vote for Obama and remember that it is not enough to merely vote for him.

    Just as it is not enough to merely vote for new city council members, but never bother to show up at their periodic meetings and speak out on issues.

    FDR asked labor leaders to pressure him (to create a movement) and they did.

    If we vote for Obama (and I will), we need to keep up the pressure on him after the election.

    And we need to pay attention to ideas like Stoller’s to help us remember where to apply the pressure.

  3. Tim Gawne says:
    October 28, 2012 at 1:08 pm

    It should now be apparent that voting for the ‘lesser of two evils’ is a mistake. It let’s you win 50% of the tactical battles, but 100% guarantees that you will lose the war.

    In the early part of the 20th century progressives had principles. If a politician stabbed them in the back they were declared the enemy and progressives would never vote for them even if the other guy was slightly worse.

    William Jennings Bryan lost three times – and his principles triumphed, and eventually even Republicans like Eisenhower embraced the new deal.

    Voting for Obama will not ‘pressure’ him to do anything – on the contrary. It will empower right-wing politicians (R+D alike) that they have nothing to lose by declaring war on working people. And will cut the legs out from under any politician thinking of supporting us.

    If we reward our enemies, and refuse to support our friends, and then one day we wake up and have nothing but enemies, well, are you surprised?

    Stoller hit the nail on the head. What’s wrong with us all, anyhow?

  4. Douglas Keachie says:
    October 29, 2012 at 4:49 am

    It seems to me obvious that the economic woes started and will continue with the increase in automation and the flow of jobs offshore, and the continuous dumbing down of the American public via poorly funded education and social programs, plus advertising aimed at producing fearful, insecure consumers.

    I have no qualms about voting for Neil deGrasse Tyson for Prexy because both campaigns have already ceded California to Obama, and I want whoever looks at my ballot to know that I want:

    more attention paid to Fukishima, a whole lot more.
    more attention paid to NASA and space exploration.
    and more attention paid to global warming, regardless of the cause.

    I also believe that we need a massive PR job to get kids in school to understand that they become what they have learned, and a rewards program should be set up for those fields in which we need more educated folks. Yes, pay them 10% cash up front, and 90% toward college/voc-ed funds, they pick. The taxpayer can’t afford to rebuild all the vo-ed that has been stripped away over the last 50 years, so having motivated students pay for private training, perhaps even during high school, seems to me to be a good idea.

    BTW, the Nevada County ballot allows room only for a Prexy write-in, and no room for the VEEP as a write-in. For a variety of reasons, I would vote Chris Rock for VEEP. One, he’s remarkable smart and articulate like Tyson, and two, nobody who didn’t like Tyson for racial reasons would even consider bad things, if Chris Rock were the replacement.

  5. Ed Peritz says:
    October 29, 2012 at 7:57 am

    Any progressive who votes in such a fashion as to allow Romney and Ryan to win, regardless of Stollar’s perspective, is ‘copping’ out.’ Teddy Roosevelt said to Ernst Hanfstaengl–per his memoir–“Remember that in politics the choice is the lesser of two evils.” Those sentiments prevail, I suppose, because no president, constantly bombarded by powerful, diverse, competing vectors of “I wants”, can possibly accomplish all of what “the better angels of their nature,” conceive. And in an age of no compromise fanaticism, I’d say Obama’s done OK.

    A win for the R & R boys, where facts and truth, for them, are whatever blather escapes lips that are mere slaves of greed. And their Oily Magnate supporters and slick handlers know that the words of a dead master of deceit speak ugly truths about victorious tactics: “limit subjects to . . . simple subjects; Political agitation must be primitive; the trouble with other parties . . .they have become too . . .academic;the ordinary man . . . cannot follow.”

    It is not nor will it ever be, the best of all possible worlds. We are not the United States of Disneyland.
    The primary political option today for thinking, progressives, must be what is possible. Stopping the extreme right-wing, backed by Idiot America, is still the goal. Burn that article; we live in a world that will never become paradise.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published.

CLICK IMAGE BELOW FOR MORE INFORMATION

DONATE TO THE FOOD BANK OF NEVADA COUNTY

(CLICK IMAGE)

DONATE TO NEVADA COUNTY RELIEF FUND (click image below)

Subscribe to Sierra Voices Journal

Jack Kornfield: A Steady Heart in Time of Corona Virus (Part I)

Erika Lewis, Shaye Cohn, Craig Flory – Got A Mind To Ramble

“Everlasting Arms”

Tara Brach: A Steady Heart in Time of Corona Virus (Part II)

Recent Posts

  • Biden May Be Wrong in His Foreign Policy But At Least He Lacks Spine in His Domestic Agenda
  • “Betrayal”: Biden cut deal with McConnell to appoint “extremist” anti-abortion judge, Democrat says
  • Ukraine Is the Latest Neocon Disaster
  • Where to get abortion pills and how to use them
  • In Ukraine, Diplomacy Has Been Ruled Out

Recent Comments

  • Biden May Be Wrong in His Foreign Policy But At Least He Lacks Spine in His Domestic Agenda on “Betrayal”: Biden cut deal with McConnell to appoint “extremist” anti-abortion judge, Democrat says
  • Ukraine Is the Latest Neocon Disaster on America shoots its own dollar empire in economic attack on Russia
  • Putin in Media Myth and Reality: Which is Which? on Ukraine War: A Bonanza for the Arms Industry
  • SVadmin on Countdown to World War III?
  • Pratima Basu on Scenes From Our Weekend at Lake Tahoe

Archives

  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • November 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • December 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • January 2014
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009

Categories

  • Abortion
  • Afghanistan
  • Aging
  • American Empire
  • Anti-Depressant
  • Arms Sales
  • Articles
  • Atlas Obscura
  • Authoritarianism
  • Black Lives
  • Black Lives Matter
  • Blog
  • Buddhism
  • Budget
  • Buskers
  • Capitalism
  • Carbon Offsets
  • Cartoon
  • China
  • Climate Change
  • Compassion
  • Constitution
  • Corona Virus
  • Corruption
  • Cosmology
  • Coup
  • COVID-19
  • Democracy
  • Depression
  • Disenfranchisement
  • Drought
  • Economics
  • Education
  • Election Fraud
  • Empire
  • Environment
  • Extinction
  • Farming
  • Fascism
  • Filibuster
  • Fire!
  • Food Insecurity
  • Foreign Policy
  • Forest Ecology
  • Forest Management
  • Fracking
  • Gardening
  • Gender
  • GOP
  • Great Movies
  • Groundwater
  • Halloween
  • Health Care
  • High Country News
  • History
  • Humor
  • Hunger
  • Idaho-Maryland Mine
  • Ignorance
  • Immigration
  • Indigenous Peoples' Day
  • Insects
  • Israel
  • Labor
  • Lobbying
  • Local
  • Lunar Influence
  • Marijuana
  • Masks
  • Medical Care
  • Men
  • Men's Issues
  • Mental Health
  • Middle Class
  • Military Industrial Complex
  • Mining
  • MMT
  • Modern Monetary Theory
  • Moral Obligations
  • Music
  • Native Americans
  • NATO
  • Neocons
  • Neoliberalism
  • New Cold War
  • Nuclear War
  • Nutrition
  • Oligarchy
  • Palestine
  • Pandemic
  • Parenting
  • Peace
  • Pharmaceuticals
  • Physics
  • Poetry
  • Police
  • Politics
  • Populism
  • Press
  • Race
  • Religion
  • Republican Derangement
  • Reviews
  • Revolution
  • Right-wing terrorism
  • Rights of Nature
  • Rise Gold
  • Rivers
  • Romance
  • Russia
  • Russiagate
  • Science
  • Slavery
  • Sleep
  • Smoke Inhalation
  • Spineless
  • Student Debt
  • Summer
  • Technology
  • The Hartmann Report
  • Trump Virus
  • Tuba Skinny
  • Tyranny
  • Ukraine
  • Uncategorized
  • Unipolar vs. Multipolar
  • Vaccine Refusal
  • Vaccine Safety
  • Voting
  • War
  • War on Government
  • Water
  • Watersheds
  • Wells
  • Wildfires
  • Winter
  • Women's Issues
  • Work
  • Yemen

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
© 2022   All Rights Reserved.