<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: We Need to Subsidize Journalism as a Public Good</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sierravoices.com/2010/02/we-need-to-subsidize-journalism-as-a-public-good/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sierravoices.com/2010/02/we-need-to-subsidize-journalism-as-a-public-good/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 12:40:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Don Pelton</title>
		<link>http://sierravoices.com/2010/02/we-need-to-subsidize-journalism-as-a-public-good/comment-page-1/#comment-442</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Pelton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 03:41:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sierravoices.com/?p=2426#comment-442</guid>
		<description>McChesney seems to be saying that such profitability is a thing of the past. Time will tell who&#039;s right.

I suppose one could make the argument that journalism is a publilc good that should be subsidized whether it&#039;s profitable or not. That sounds right to me, since the profit arrangement had already brought us tremendous concentration of corporate ownership even before the recent meltdown, hardly a healthy development for a press that is supposed to speak truth to power.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>McChesney seems to be saying that such profitability is a thing of the past. Time will tell who&#8217;s right.</p>
<p>I suppose one could make the argument that journalism is a publilc good that should be subsidized whether it&#8217;s profitable or not. That sounds right to me, since the profit arrangement had already brought us tremendous concentration of corporate ownership even before the recent meltdown, hardly a healthy development for a press that is supposed to speak truth to power.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Pelline</title>
		<link>http://sierravoices.com/2010/02/we-need-to-subsidize-journalism-as-a-public-good/comment-page-1/#comment-441</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Pelline</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 02:50:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sierravoices.com/?p=2426#comment-441</guid>
		<description>Thanks Don. Let&#039;s not forgot what got newspapers in trouble: building newspaper &quot;chains&quot; and big debt loads that they can&#039;t pay off now. Journalism is a profitable enough business, with the right leaders and cost structure. Its margins are way better than grocery stores, for example. New competitors need to spring up just as they have for hundreds of years in the print world. They will too. It&#039;s an exciting era.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Don. Let&#8217;s not forgot what got newspapers in trouble: building newspaper &#8220;chains&#8221; and big debt loads that they can&#8217;t pay off now. Journalism is a profitable enough business, with the right leaders and cost structure. Its margins are way better than grocery stores, for example. New competitors need to spring up just as they have for hundreds of years in the print world. They will too. It&#8217;s an exciting era.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

