• Home
  • Aging
  • Economics
  • Environment
  • Fire!
  • Foreign Policy
  • Gender
  • Health Care
  • History
  • Humor
  • Labor
  • Local
  • Mining
  • Music
  • Parenting
  • Poetry
  • Politics
  • Race
  • Reviews
  • Science
  • War
  • Water
  • Search Icon

County is Withholding Key Part of LSSI Proposal From Public View

County is Withholding Key Part of LSSI Proposal From Public View

December 3, 2009 SVadmin Comments 2 comments

blindfoldedAs I was reading LSSI’s response to Nevada County’s RFP for outsourcing management of its library system, I felt as Pinocchio must have felt when he glimpsed the glittering temptations of Playland, but — unlike Pinocchio — I had the uneasy feeling that there may be danger within.

LSSI promises much: a 14% increase in hours among the six county libraries, a $130,000 investment of “corporate resources” for capital improvements, the possibility of grants as an extra source of funding, marketing strategies to increase community involvement (in a county where 67,000 people already have library cards), improved children’s programs, upgraded computer systems, etc.

All this and more (including LSSI’s profit) “for a cost that is nearly 7% less than the current budget proposed by the County.”

What’s wrong with this picture?

For starters, despite LSSI’s claim in its cover letter that it can keep the six library locations open for “14% more hours … for a cost that is nearly 7% less than the current budget proposed by the County,” nowhere in the 64-page proposal released to the public does it detail its budget, or otherwise prove its claim that such savings are possible. We are asked to accept the 7% figure on faith, with no clue about how it would be achieved.

Section 6.4 of the RFP stipulates that the prospective contractor should submit a detailed cost proposal in a separate sealed envelope.

Either LSSI failed to provide these cost figures in a separate envelope or else the County has not released the cost calculations to the public.

What figure is LSSI using for the “current budget proposed by the County?”

If LSSI is proposing merely to reduce expenses by 7%, then the following table (derived from data in Mary Ann Trygg’s memo of 9/28/09 to the Board, without factoring in the Library Fund offsets, since the fund dries up rapidly) shows that such a plan would be insufficient to solve the library’s overall budget problem: there would continue to be somewhat smaller shortfalls, but shortfalls nonetheless:

Projected

Revenue

Projected

Expense

Projected

Shortfall

LSSI (7% Reduced)

Expense

LSSI

Shortfall

2011 $2,129,123 $2,585,786 $456,663 $2,404,781 $275,658
2012 $2,163,723 $2,715,535 $551,812 $2,525,448 $361,725
2013 $2,234,654 $2,766,696 $532,042 $2,573,027 $338,373
2014 $2,309,131 $2,820,586 $511,455 $2,623,145 $314,014

Obviously, in order for the general public to participate meaningfully in the discussion of the merits of the LSSI proposal, it will have to see the missing cost portion of that document.

I sent the following email today to the Library Outsourcing FAQ, with cc to the Board of Supervisors:

To: Library Outsourcing FAQ:
(cc to Board of Supervisors)

Please add the following to the list of questions you are answering in the Frequently Asked Questions document (FAQ):

“When will the cost estimates presumably submitted by LSSI as part of its proposal, as specified in section 6.4 of the RFP, be made available to the general public? Releasing the cover letter and proposal without the cost portion makes it impossible for the general public to judge the merits of LSSI’s offer, or indeed to participate meaningfully in the discussion of their proposal.”

Thank you.

Sincerely,

Don Pelton
Editor, “Sierra Voices” (http://sierravoices.com)

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Blog, Local
Library_Outsourcing, LocalJournalism

Post navigation

NEXT
Think You Know Where Computing is Headed? Watch This Genius!
PREVIOUS
Library Anti-Privatization Rally

2 thoughts on “County is Withholding Key Part of LSSI Proposal From Public View”

  1. Douglas Keachie says:
    December 4, 2009 at 7:16 am

    The Rape of the Librarians goes on and on. The quality of life goes downhill, as the county slips into Placer/Roseville mush. What a bunch of coward bullies we have leading the county!

    Reply
  2. Pingback: County Will Make LSSI Cost Breakdown Public (But Not Online) : Sierra Voices

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

SUBSCRIBE TO SIERRA VOICES JOURNAL

Signup for Mail from Sierra Voices Journal

Please wait...

Thank you for signing up!

Recent Posts

  • Because ‘For-Profit Motive Does Not Work,’ Ro Khanna Backs Public Ownership of PG&E as Fires Rip Through California
  • A Book of Questions (Yet To Be Answered)
  • Turning 75 in the Age of Trump
  • Announcing Retrial, Federal Prosecutors to Continue ‘Unconscionable Prosecution’ of Humanitarian Scott Warren for Helping Migrants
  • What’s Next for the Youth Climate Lawsuit

Recent Comments

  • reader on Because ‘For-Profit Motive Does Not Work,’ Ro Khanna Backs Public Ownership of PG&E as Fires Rip Through California
  • RickD on “Noam Chomsky: The Real Election Meddling Isn’t Coming From Russia”
  • RickD on Turning 75 in the Age of Trump
  • (Posted by) Don Pelton on Midterm America: A Blue Wave From Another Universe
  • RickD on Trump’s Grand Strategy

Archives

  • November 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • December 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • January 2014
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009

Categories

  • Aging
  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Economics
  • Education
  • Environment
  • Fire!
  • Foreign Policy
  • Gender
  • Health Care
  • History
  • Humor
  • Labor
  • Local
  • Mining
  • Music
  • Native Americans
  • Parenting
  • Poetry
  • Politics
  • Reviews
  • Science
  • Uncategorized
  • War
  • Water

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries RSS
  • Comments RSS
  • WordPress.org
© 2019   All Rights Reserved.